post chilton the blair apoligist supremo is pursuasive that his leader didn't mislead (so to speak).
Come on - you cannot have it both ways - if he didn't, then he sure was incompetent taking such poor intelligence advice.
once again:- either blair and his gang are guilty of gross negligence in not taking more care over such important decisions, OR they were unethical in extreme.
That is the reason people are slack-jawed in amazement once again at the parade of
afghanistan - sure - necessary - almost as clear cut a case as the falklands.
iraq - unnecessary, disastrously planned in any case for the aftermath, and
an appaling waste of lives and opportunities, now leading to a less safe world.
there's no point flogging a dead horse over this any more tho - basically
you are either pro-blair or you are with us. you are either wrong or right.
you're preaching to the deaf or the converted...